The National Geographic one gets me all the time.
Nothing special. Expect Homestuck & OFF... really.
The National Geographic one gets me all the time.
✡ WATCH ONLINE: The CHiRAL Night 2.0 Mini Scenes – Youtube Playlist
✡ DOWNLOAD: Mega Link✮✮ The team belatedly wishes you all a very Merry Christmas! ✮✮
What are “The CHiRAL Night 2.0 – Mini Scenes”?
The Mini Scenes are short video continuations of the re:connect routes that were shown at The CHiRAL Night 2.0 Event, which took place during the summer of 2013. This event was basically a concert where the singers for the various Nitro+CHiRAL games performed their respective songs.
HELLO THANK U NEW FOLLOWERS U FOLLOWED ME 4 HOMESTUCK ILL GIVE U HOMESTUCK
I had just gotten home from school and my older brother was home so I started annoying him while wearing my unicorn mask and he just stops and goes
"fine. fine. I know how to deal with this"
and goes into his room
and comes out with an actual samurai sword
anD CHASES ME
SAYING HE’S A UNICORN HUNTER
HELP HE’S 21
Tuesday Tips SUPER WEEK - Push it!
Clarity is probably the most important thing to think about at all time when boarding. Pushing your poses to an undeniable level of clarity will improve the clarity of the storytelling in general. Don’t leave space for uncertainty in posing out your characters. Your audience will be more engaged and entertained by the sequence.
This is the last post for the Super Week. I hope you enjoyed it. Back on the regular schedule next week (Every Tuesday).
I’m a terrible person, this is the other sketch from the exact same page as the last.
The original post is gaining at a rate of 1,000 notes in a minute
Before you reblog, comment, or send an ask always check the blog.
I do not want another person driven off of this site or get death threats because they were uneducated about a topic.
bringing this back :)
well, thats enough internet for today
good. yes.OH. Plant monster dingus.
Hi I want a million of these pillows and I want to send them out to my family.
The man who brought hundreds of thousands of teenagers to tears.
Grand Theft Venice
WHEN YOUR BOAT GETS SHANGAIED BY A WEIRD HOODED GUY,
now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes
The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.
But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.
The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!
Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.
BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.
Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?
Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?
So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.
Thank you for your time.
Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.
Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.
And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.
So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.
hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.
I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe
Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.
The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?
On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.
Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?
Actually, Mr. Godot!!
Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…
If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!
Aah… these M&M’s droplets
So colourful… reminds me of the days of my youth!
the red ones remind me of my hemorroids… *cough*
I have found some new evidence though the original image source suggesting this second image has been tampered with!
This image clearly shows candies that correspond to the colours commonly found in M & M s… The edge of the bowl is visible, as are some ‘M’ symbols, if you look closely.
This suggests the second image in the original is perhaps just a fabrication based off of the second.
It is clearly a fraud!
You shouldn’t jump the “fraud” gun just yet, Wright. If your source is really the corresponding photo to the first, then the “gumball” picture in question might not be at fault. To put it bluntly, it might just be a copycat.
To put it another way, this could just be a case of a mistaken and mismatched photoset..
With all the evidence provided, I think it’s safe to assume this case could be solved: The candies in the second photograph are not M&Ms, but the photo itself was not exactly tampered with. It was just a completely separate photo of separate candies, possibly just misplaced in this set by the original poster, who was completely unaware of the mismatch!
Hold it right there everyone.
A PUZZLE HIDDEN IN THAT BOWL OF MISLEADING CANDY.
God Bless Tumblr.
holy fucking shit
Draw me like one of your French girls.
I’m the most serious Mizuki cosplayer ever.
We interrupt your regularly scheduled horror to bring you the most disgustingly adorable things I have ever seen gosh dang